In the first part of this free CCNP \/ BSCI tutorial, we looked at how leaving one simple word out of our route redistribution configuration – “subnets” – resulted in an incomplete routing table when redistributing routes from RIP to OSPF. (If you missed that part of the tutorial, visit my website’s “Free Tutorials” section.) Today, we’ll look at redistributing OSPF routes into RIP and identify another common redistribution error.\nWe are using a three-router network. R5 is running RIP, R1 is serving as a hub between R5 and R3 and is running RIP and OSPF, and R3 is running OSPF.\nTo begin this lab, we’ll add three loopbacks to R3 and advertise them to R1 via OSPF.\nR3(config)#int loopback33\nR3(config-if)#ip address 22.214.171.124 255.255.255.255\nR3(config-if)#int loopback34\nR3(config-if)#ip address 126.96.36.199 255.255.255.255\nR3(config-if)#int loopback35\nR3(config-if)#ip address 188.8.131.52 255.255.255.255\nR3(config-if)#router ospf 1\nR3(config-router)#network 184.108.40.206 0.0.0.0 area 1\nR3(config-router)#network 220.127.116.11 0.0.0.0 area 1\nR3(config-router)#network 18.104.22.168 0.0.0.0 area 1\nR1 sees all three of these routes in its routing table.\nR1#show ip route ospf\n22.214.171.124\/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets\nO IA 126.96.36.199 via 188.8.131.52, 00:00:55, Serial0\n184.108.40.206\/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets\nO IA 220.127.116.11 via 18.104.22.168, 00:00:45, Serial0\n22.214.171.124\/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets\nO IA 126.96.36.199 via 188.8.131.52, 00:00:55, Serial0\nWe’ll now redistribute these routes into RIP on R1. Remember the “subnets” option we talked about in the first part of this tutorial? There is no such option when redistributing OSPF routes into RIP, as IOS Help shows us.\nR1(config)#router rip\nR1(config-router)#redistribute ospf 1 ?\nmatch Redistribution of OSPF routes\nmetric Metric for redistributed routes\nroute-map Route map reference\nvrf VPN Routing\/Forwarding Instance\n<cr>\nR1(config-router)#redistribute ospf 1\nThe routes have been redistributed into RIP with the redistribute ospf 1 command. (The “1” is the OSPF process number.) Let’s look at R5 and see the results.\nR5#show ip route rip\nR5#\nThe routes aren’t there, but we didn’t get a warning from the router that we needed to do anything else. What is the problem?\nThe problem is that RIP requires a seed metric to be specified when redistributing routes into that protocol. A seed metric is a “starter metric” that gives the RIP process a metric it can work with. The OSPF metric of cost is incomprehensible to RIP, since RIP’s sole metric is hop count. We’ve got to give RIP a metric it understands when redistributing routes into that protocol, so let’s go back to R1 and do so.\nR1(config)#router rip\nR1(config-router)#no redistribute ospf 1\nR1(config-router)#redistribute ospf 1 metric 2\nR5 now sees the routes. Note that the metric contained in the brackets is the seed metric.\nR5#show ip route rip\n184.108.40.206\/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets\nR 220.127.116.11 via 18.104.22.168, 00:00:24, Ethernet0\n22.214.171.124\/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets\nR 126.96.36.199 via 188.8.131.52, 00:00:24, Ethernet0\n184.108.40.206\/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets\nR 220.127.116.11 via 18.104.22.168, 00:00:24, Ethernet0\nIf you read the previous tutorial, you may have noticed that we did not specify a seed metric for OSPF. OSPF does not require a seed metric to be set during redistribution. You also noticed that the router did tell us that there might be a problem when we left the “subnets” option out of RIP>OSPF redistribution, but the router didn’t tell us anything about a seed metric when we performed OSPF>RIP redistribution. This is a detail you must know by heart in order to make your route redistribution successful!